By: Robin Tatam

It is absolutely vital that all trustees, existing and potential, should fully understand that there is a minimum level of commitment including proactive input of their own initiative.
Too many think it is sufficient to take on the role and responsibilities and sit back to be spoon-fed briefings, attending to the charity only on picking up the pack on the day of the board meeting, and remain inert in between.
There should be an understanding that the minimum of several hours a week should be set aside, to consider the charity’s interests - if that cannot be afforded in a busy schedule, do not become a trustee!
Often the resentment and adverse reaction when the chair asks for more active input and increased overt interest in charity matters, is extraordinary.
Too often trustees come onboard with their own agenda which does not always align with the charity’s own, and take the line that since it is a voluntary contribution, there should be no criticism, just gratitude.
Trustees should be treated as if employees, with job specification, and certainly, annual performance review.
Sitting back and feeling worthy is not an option.
Those brought in for access to their particular expertise and experience do not have to take on trusteeship for that advice to be available.
There is an urgent need for a completely different understanding of trusteeship.